 |
|
|
Review by
a visitor on 28.5.2006
|
 |
I bought my Coxx Lets Roll from a small local musicstore called "Osas?vel", that is "Partial tone" in english. I donnullt remembet what I paid for it, but it was cheap, related to other guitars of the same looks (Gibson, Epiphone).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Features |
|
|
| |
Guitar looks great to me. I was looking a black Les Paul -lookalike, and I founf it. Craftwork is well done, nothing to complain about that. Overall its very "gitbsonlike". Only thing that bothers me is the Coxx Lets Roll -text on the head. Itnulls kinda childish this "Lets Roll". They could have named it differently! |
|
| |
| |
| |
Playability |
|
|
| |
Well itnulls far better than my older guitar, Williamsnull Jackson-copy. I like playing with it. Itnulls easy to pick, comp and play solonulls with it. It sound good. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Quality |
|
|
| |
Sounds good, doesnullnt make any unwanted noise, sound can be varied by adjusting tone (separate for each humbucker) and treble/rythm-switch. Does what it promises, but doesnnullt have anything unique. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Durability |
|
|
| |
Its very reliable. It keeps tune well, only the G-string drops tune some times for reason unknown (might be because of the strings, I havennullt changed them for ages!). Not often, but sometimes after long and hard playing it must be tuned. This guitar has served me well in those couble of gigs Inullve played with it, nothing to comblane about it. It hasnullnt needed any other adjusting. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Overall |
|
|
| |
I chose this guitar because I liked the looks of it. And I was positively surpised with itnulls playability. I was expecting a mediocre practise-guitar, but it turned out to be my favourite gig-guitar. Inullm not planning to buy a replacement anytime soon. |
|
|
| |
|
Review by
a visitor on 7.4.2005
|
|
Ok, i bought it dead blind from an international company Thomann(HQ shop situated in Germany), and couldnnullt really at first know what it was i was getting. First when i tested it i was pretty shocked. I was pretty amateur at that time but i could honestly feel i had made a great deal and my father who is a professional praised it too. the price was 286 euros and inullm still pretty pleased.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Features |
|
|
| |
Well itnulls design doesnnullt quite match itnulls gibson counterpart but it really doesnnullt matter as itnulls beautiful anyway. Sound is great and it doesnnullt even lose itnulls tune over quite long time. There are no real negative points that i could really come up with right now. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Playability |
|
|
| |
To make it short, compared to others it seems like a steady and reliable guitar. Even compared to some expensiver ones. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Quality |
|
|
| |
Sounds really good, and easily controllable. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Durability |
|
|
| |
I remember i straightened the neck once before testing it, but everything else was on itnulls spot, and since then there hasnnullt been anything to do to it really. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Overall |
|
|
| |
To me the Coxx Letnulls Roll was a positive surprise and altought childish, i guess i wonnullt get rid of it ever and suggest it as a potential competitor in the grade of fine guitars. |
|
|
| |
|
Review by
a visitor on 9.3.2005
|
|
I was chrismas shopping in milton keynes a couple of days after seeing Velvet Revolver in Brixton,(and I have always wanted a les paul, but couldnt afford Gibson prices.)to see Slash ripping up his collection of Les Pauls just made me want one all the more.So I shopped around for a nice copy,Chappels in Milton Keynes,had a few nice coppies,and after a bit of research(and the guy in the shop knocking off ?100.)I got my Coxx Lets Roll for ?150.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Features |
|
|
| |
To the best of my knowlage it is very simillar to a Gibson black beauty,with all the metal work being of brass like appearance,and rather than dots on the(22 frets) fret board(like most Les Paul coppies I have seen)it has the nice square mother of pearl style inlays.The detail on the head stock is very nice too,even down to the "custom" decal.The outward face of the body beautifully shaped,and the rear is dead flat.The bridge is fully adjustable but,I have left it as brought it as the action is plenty low enough,and a pleasure to play.There are obvious differences between the Coxx and the Gibson,the most immediate to the eye being the "hooked" section of the body wich is usually more rounded on an orriginal,but comes to more of a point on this model. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Playability |
|
|
| |
Since buying this guitar i have had some trouble...with putting it down that is.Befor this Coxx I had a Charvelle,wich although a fine guitar in its own right,did not seem to have the same plyability,i.e. the Coxx is a lot more effortless to play.I feel less "obliged" to play it and more "privalliged" to do so. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Quality |
|
|
| |
This axe sounds so good I feel almost guilty that I only paid ?150 for it.And its own natural great sound coupled with my new multi effects marshall,makes for an awesome package.There is a barely audiable hum but I have been reliably infomed that this will be cured with the purchase of a particular lead |
|
| |
| |
| |
Durability |
|
|
| |
This is my fith guitar,and although it is early days,it would seem that the Coxx holds its tuning a lot longer than most.And for a copy it has the sweetest sound you could wish for,with very good sustain and natural tone.And as for gigging,it should be perfect,a very robust guitar,even without a bolt through neck. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Overall |
|
|
| |
To be honest,I really donnullt think that I will be buying a new guitar for a long,long time.After looking at various forums on the net,it seemed aparent to me that the Coxx was used by a lot of guitarists and a lot of them proffesionals.These facts along with the awesome discount from the guy at Chappels(I nearly bit his hand off)made this guitar the obvious choice.I must say,I am having some trouble finding Coxx guitars on the net.Do they have their own web site?I can only seem to find their distributers,can any one help?In closing may I just say that I would recommend this guitar to any one who asknulls,and at this sort of price,it would make an ideal axe for a beginer,that would see them through well into accomplisment. |
|
|
| |
|
Review by
a visitor on 20.10.2004
|
|
I bought it on a music shop in drammen Norway
For 4 000 kr Norwegian money eks. 1 dollar 8 norwegian money
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
Features |
|
|
| |
It`s a red and a solid guitar.
It doesn`t have no weak points. But on design there is a lot of things that isnt a les paul |
|
| |
| |
| |
Playability |
|
|
| |
You can play with a lot of other innstruments because of the solid body!! |
|
| |
| |
| |
Quality |
|
|
| |
Yes beacuse a lot of other les paul`s don`t have enough treble in the treble buck!!. |
|
| |
| |
| |
Durability |
|
|
| |
A Gibson Les Paul is not better.
Its` steady for live gigs!! |
|
| |
| |
| |
Overall |
|
|
| |
I bought it Because of the pretty look and the good sound!! |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
